https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61754
S. Davis Herring changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||herring at lanl dot gov
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61754
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
I suspect __attribute__((deprecated)) doesn't work quite the way you would like
in C++ either. It only happens to do what you expect (i.e., not trigger a
warning) in the case in comment #0 but not in others,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61754
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Krügler ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5)
> Would the solution described in bug 79078 comment 14 do what you're looking
> for?
Yes, that sounds plausible. But I'm just wondering: Don't you consider the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61754
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Would the solution described in bug 79078 comment 14 do what you're looking
for?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61754
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3)
> I find the [[deprecated]] behavior for the test cases here reasonable and
> useful: the struct type is declared deprecated and so its subsequent uses
> are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61754
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61754
Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61754
Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw4rd at verizon dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||3dw4rd at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61754
emsr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||emsr at gcc dot gnu.org
