https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67050
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67050
--- Comment #5 from Louis Dionne ---
Agreed, the ICE seems to be fixed on trunk. However, the error you're getting
is still a bug, right? The code compiles if I use `this->X()`,
but not `X()` alone.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67050
--- Comment #7 from Louis Dionne ---
Yes, it seems like a dup. However, it would still be nice to know when this bug
was fixed, because it seems unlikely to have been fixed by chance... It could
be that something's still wrong, but the compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67050
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67050
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Not sure, you'd have to ask the C++ folks. You mentioned PR61636 though, and
that looks similar - is this one a dup?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67050
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67050
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(But it's a different ICE than the one in the Description.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67050
Louis Dionne ldionne.2 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ldionne.2 at