https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 7 14:43:14 2016
New Revision: 234028
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234028=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/67364
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_store_expression): Replace
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Mar 6 06:47:22 2016
New Revision: 234013
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234013=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/67364
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_store_expression): Replace
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364
--- Comment #13 from Louis Dionne ---
Actually, the problem is much worse than I thought. It turns out that with -O1,
the following code does not pass the assertion:
#include
template
struct tuple {
Xn storage_;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364
--- Comment #12 from Louis Dionne ---
The following code still fails to compile on GCC trunk:
template
struct tuple {
Xn storage_;
constexpr tuple(Xn const& xn)
: storage_(xn)
{ }
template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 4 22:09:19 2016
New Revision: 233983
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233983=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/67364
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_component_reference):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 4 22:08:22 2016
New Revision: 233982
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233982=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/67364
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_component_reference):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Mar 3 22:45:16 2016
New Revision: 233948
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233948=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/67364
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_component_reference): Just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Mar 3 22:43:03 2016
New Revision: 233945
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233945=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/67364
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_component_reference): Just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Feb 25 14:10:09 2016
New Revision: 233718
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233718=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/67364
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_component_reference): Don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Feb 25 14:09:24 2016
New Revision: 233716
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233716=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/67364
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_component_reference): Don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Is there any practical difference between brace-init-list:
constexpr closure() : member{} { }
and expression-list:
constexpr closure() : member() { }
?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
14 matches
Mail list logo
