[Bug c++/69995] [5/6 Regression] [C++14] Invalid result when evaluating constexpr function

2016-03-04 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69995 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/69995] [5/6 Regression] [C++14] Invalid result when evaluating constexpr function

2016-03-01 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69995 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Mar 2 02:44:46 2016 New Revision: 233879 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233879=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69995 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_call_expression): Unshare

[Bug c++/69995] [5/6 Regression] [C++14] Invalid result when evaluating constexpr function

2016-03-01 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69995 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Mar 2 02:32:38 2016 New Revision: 233877 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233877=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69995 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_call_expression): Unshare

[Bug c++/69995] [5/6 Regression] [C++14] Invalid result when evaluating constexpr function

2016-02-29 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69995 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 29 14:49:17 2016 New Revision: 233813 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233813=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69995 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_store_expression): Unshare

[Bug c++/69995] [5/6 Regression] [C++14] Invalid result when evaluating constexpr function

2016-02-29 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69995 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69995] [5/6 Regression] [C++14] Invalid result when evaluating constexpr function

2016-02-29 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69995 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 29 14:25:57 2016 New Revision: 233810 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233810=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69995 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_store_expression): Unshare

[Bug c++/69995] [5/6 Regression] [C++14] Invalid result when evaluating constexpr function

2016-02-29 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69995 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/69995] [5/6 Regression] [C++14] Invalid result when evaluating constexpr function

2016-02-29 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69995 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/69995] [5/6 Regression] [C++14] Invalid result when evaluating constexpr function

2016-02-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69995 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.4

[Bug c++/69995] [5/6 Regression] [C++14] Invalid result when evaluating constexpr function

2016-02-28 Thread ldionne.2 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69995 --- Comment #2 from Louis Dionne --- I know but using a runtime assert allows showing that with/without constexpr have different results. Also, I wanted to emphasize the fact that it could result into a runtime error, since these are much more

[Bug c++/69995] [5/6 Regression] [C++14] Invalid result when evaluating constexpr function

2016-02-28 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69995 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal