[Bug c++/70001] [5 Regression] Infinity compilation time

2017-10-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|5.5 |6.0

[Bug c++/70001] [5 Regression] Infinity compilation time

2017-10-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70001] [5 Regression] Infinity compilation time

2016-06-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|5.4 |5.5 --- Comment #12 from Richard

[Bug c++/70001] [5 Regression] Infinity compilation time

2016-03-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Mar 23 18:55:38 2016 New Revision: 234439 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234439=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/70001 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_vec_init_1): Reuse

[Bug c++/70001] [5 Regression] Infinity compilation time

2016-03-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6 regression] Infinity |[5 Regression] Infinity

[Bug c++/70001] [5 regression] Infinity compilation time

2016-02-28 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #6) > struct X > { > int a; > > constexpr X () : a (0) { } > }; > > const int N = 1 << 19; > > struct A > { > X elems[N]; > } F; > > > Just playing around,

[Bug c++/70001] [5 regression] Infinity compilation time

2016-02-28 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001 --- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka --- struct X { int a; constexpr X () : a (0) { } }; const int N = 1 << 19; struct A { X elems[N]; } F; Just playing around, but naively sharing the constructor of each array element in the case of

[Bug c++/70001] [5 regression] Infinity compilation time

2016-02-28 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/70001] [5 regression] Infinity compilation time

2016-02-28 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from

[Bug c++/70001] [5 regression] Infinity compilation time

2016-02-28 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Actually the nested array is enough to reproduce the issue: #include #include const int LOG = 17; const int N = (1 << LOG); std::array, LOG> F;

[Bug c++/70001] [5 regression] Infinity compilation time

2016-02-28 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- markus@x4 tmp % cat fft-old.cpp #include #include using namespace std; typedef std::complex cd; const int LOG = 17; const int N = (1 << LOG); array A; array B; void FFT(array

[Bug c++/70001] [5 regression] Infinity compilation time

2016-02-28 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|