[Bug c/49859] gcc could warn about statements between "switch" and first "case"

2016-05-23 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49859 --- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon May 23 15:37:09 2016 New Revision: 236597 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236597=gcc=rev Log: PR c/49859 * common.opt (Wswitch-unreachable): New option.

[Bug c/49859] gcc could warn about statements between "switch" and first "case"

2016-05-23 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49859 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/49859] gcc could warn about statements between "switch" and first "case"

2016-05-12 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49859 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek --- C FE patch: .

[Bug c/49859] gcc could warn about statements between "switch" and first "case"

2016-01-28 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49859 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c/49859] gcc could warn about statements between "switch" and first "case"

2016-01-28 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49859 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kaie at kuix dot de --- Comment #6 from

[Bug c/49859] gcc could warn about statements between switch and first case

2014-09-23 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49859 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug c/49859] gcc could warn about statements between switch and first case

2011-07-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49859 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/49859] gcc could warn about statements between switch and first case

2011-07-26 Thread wkoszek at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49859 --- Comment #1 from Wojciech Koszek wkoszek at gmail dot com 2011-07-27 01:16:25 UTC --- I'd expect GCC to warn me about this case, since it's very likely an error.

[Bug c/49859] gcc could warn about statements between switch and first case

2011-07-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49859 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-27 01:22:05 UTC --- -Wunreachable-code support was removed because it dependent on optimization and caused some false positives (well they are not false positives in the sense

[Bug c/49859] gcc could warn about statements between switch and first case

2011-07-26 Thread wkoszek at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49859 --- Comment #3 from Wojciech Koszek wkoszek at gmail dot com 2011-07-27 01:28:28 UTC --- Looks like GCC and Clang both agree on Duff's stuff: wkoszek@wkoszek:~/p/duff$ cat duff.c #include stdio.h void duff(to, from, count) register short *to,