http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54745
Bug #: 54745
Summary: gcc/c/c-typeck.c: CASE_CONVERT possible coding bug ?
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: dcb...@hotmail.com
[dcb@zippy trunk]$ fgrep CASE_CONVERT gcc/c/*.c
gcc/c/c-typeck.c: CASE_CONVERT:
gcc/c/c-typeck.c: CASE_CONVERT:
The two pieces of code are
case REALPART_EXPR:
case IMAGPART_EXPR:
CASE_CONVERT:
case ADDR_EXPR:
and
CASE_CONVERT:
case NON_LVALUE_EXPR:
case PLUS_EXPR:
It is odd to define a label and then not use it, even more
so in the middle of a switch statement. Is it likely
that the programmer intended keyword "case" on the front
of CASE_CONVERT, like
case CASE_CONVERT:
