[Bug c/64480] List designated initializer triggers -Wmissing-field-initializers

2023-04-06 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64480 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to zhonghao from comment #4) > Is this bug fixed? I tried the latest gcc, but it still rejects the sample > code. No, the latest gcc accepts this C code without errors. Please stop commenting on

[Bug c/64480] List designated initializer triggers -Wmissing-field-initializers

2023-04-06 Thread zhonghao at pku dot org.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64480 zhonghao at pku dot org.cn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn

[Bug c/64480] List designated initializer triggers -Wmissing-field-initializers

2015-09-18 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64480 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/64480] List designated initializer triggers -Wmissing-field-initializers

2015-01-05 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64480 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at

[Bug c/64480] List designated initializer triggers -Wmissing-field-initializers

2015-01-05 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64480 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I don't see this with trunk - maybe the same as bug 60784?