[Bug c/65083] Can not indirectly call some C11 atomic library functions

2016-04-22 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65083 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- It's basically a matter of whether you consider adding a new symbol version to be appropriate in a backport.

[Bug c/65083] Can not indirectly call some C11 atomic library functions

2016-04-14 Thread chris.quenelle at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65083 Chris Quenelle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chris.quenelle at oracle dot com ---

[Bug c/65083] Can not indirectly call some C11 atomic library functions

2015-11-18 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65083 --- Comment #3 from Joseph S. Myers --- Author: jsm28 Date: Wed Nov 18 22:13:44 2015 New Revision: 230578 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230578=gcc=rev Log: Add out-of-line versions of some functions (PR c/65083). PR c/65083 notes that

[Bug c/65083] Can not indirectly call some C11 atomic library functions

2015-11-18 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65083 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/65083] Can not indirectly call some C11 atomic library functions

2015-11-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65083 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/65083] Can not indirectly call some C11 atomic library functions

2015-02-17 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65083 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Presumably libatomic should get trivial wrappers for the macros, and stdatomic.h should add corresponding function declarations.