subject:"\[Bug c\/80806\] gcc does not warn if local array is memset only"

[Bug c/80806] gcc does not warn if local array is memset only

2023-07-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.5|---

[Bug c/80806] gcc does not warn if local array is memset only

2022-06-28 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|10.5 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/80806] gcc does not warn if local array is memset only

2022-01-26 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/80806] gcc does not warn if local array is memset only

2021-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/80806] gcc does not warn if local array is memset only

2021-04-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.3|10.4 --- Comment #11 from Richard

[Bug c/80806] gcc does not warn if local array is memset only

2020-07-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.2|10.3 --- Comment #10 from Richard

[Bug c/80806] gcc does not warn if local array is memset only

2020-05-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.0|10.2 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/80806] gcc does not warn if local array is memset only

2019-09-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/80806] gcc does not warn if local array is memset only

2017-08-11 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/80806] gcc does not warn if local array is memset only

2017-05-20 Thread bugzi...@poradnik-webmastera.com

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Fruzynski --- I have checked list of my issues reported here and found Bug 68034 which is closely related to this one. This patch probably will fix that one too, user will know that

[Bug c/80806] gcc does not warn if local array is memset only

2017-05-19 Thread prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806 --- Comment #5 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg01493.html

[Bug c/80806] gcc does not warn if local array is memset only

2017-05-19 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Right, const could be used in lieu of an "in" attribute for warnings. It can't be used for the same thing for optimization because constness can be cast away. Bug 10138 has a good discussion on the subject.

[Bug c/80806] gcc does not warn if local array is memset only

2017-05-19 Thread bugzi...@poradnik-webmastera.com

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Fruzynski --- "in" attribute is similar to "const", I am not sure if we need another one for this. "out" attribute would be handy. I recall than in the past I was looking for it. gcc