https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80513
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Apr 27 09:44:28 2017
New Revision: 247300
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247300=gcc=rev
Log:
PR demangler/80513 check for overflows and invalid characters in thunks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80513
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80513
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80513
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Richard Smith from comment #1)
> While we're here, this check for overflow in consume_count is nonsense, and
> any decent optimising compiler is going to optimise away the overflow check:
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80513
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oops, no, that's not the right character to check!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80513
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
For the first problem this should be sufficient:
--- a/libiberty/cplus-dem.c
+++ b/libiberty/cplus-dem.c
@@ -3173,6 +3173,8 @@ gnu_special (struct work_stuff *work, const char
**mangled, string *declp)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80513
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80513
--- Comment #1 from Richard Smith ---
While we're here, this check for overflow in consume_count is nonsense, and any
decent optimising compiler is going to optimise away the overflow check:
