--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-16 07:03 ---
Subject: Bug 30460
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 16 07:02:49 2007
New Revision: 130219
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=130219
Log:
PR driver/30460
* gcc.c (init_spec): Don't
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30460
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30460
--- Comment #8 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 21:24 ---
won't fix in GCC-4.0.x. Adjusting milestone.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.3 |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30460
--- Comment #6 from rschiele at gmail dot com 2007-01-14 08:03 ---
Agreed, but why shouldn't we change the special handling of the default specs
file as suggested in comment #4? I can't see why we should enforce people to
specify _full_ information in the default specs file if they only
--- Comment #7 from rschiele at gmail dot com 2007-01-14 13:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=12904)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12904action=view)
new version of the fix
This implements my new suggestion on how to fix this. Any comments?
--
rschiele at gmail
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 06:16 ---
In my mind this is a minor issue because the way you are using the specs file
is wrong, you are using the defaults spec file and not using the overriding
one.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: