https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103496
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103496
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0bf94da59feab2c72a02c91df310a36d33dfd1f7
commit r14-10097-g0bf94da59feab2c72a02c91df310a36d33dfd1f7
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103496
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 57937
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57937=edit
c_sizeof_8.f90
Here's a testcase derived from comment#0.
Feel free to adapt it to your meet your needs,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103496
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> The code in comment#0 compiles at r14-9893-gded646c91d2c0f
> and gives the indicated results.
which is the commit:
Fortran: fix argument checking of intrinsics
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103496
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The code in comment#0 compiles at r14-9893-gded646c91d2c0f
and gives the indicated results.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103496
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #1)
> https://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/21/21-134r2.txt
> but it still requires using interoperable types etc.
> Just asking: did you simply forget to "decorate" your
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103496
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
