--- Comment #12 from chaoyingfu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-01 00:07
---
Subject: Bug 29565
Author: chaoyingfu
Date: Fri Dec 1 00:05:26 2006
New Revision: 119383
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119383
Log:
Merged revisions 118455-118543 via svnmerge from
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-10 21:52 ---
Subject: Bug 29565
Author: pault
Date: Fri Nov 10 21:52:00 2006
New Revision: 118666
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=118666
Log:
2006-11-10 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Backport from
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-05 08:46 ---
Subject: Bug 29565
Author: pault
Date: Sun Nov 5 08:46:02 2006
New Revision: 118493
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=118493
Log:
2006-11-05 Francois-Xavier Coudert [EMAIL PROTECTED],org
--- Comment #9 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-11-05 20:36 ---
Subject: Bug number PR29565
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg00038.html
--
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-05 22:14 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.2 - soo to be fixed on 4.1.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-05 06:27 ---
Subject: Bug 29565
Author: pault
Date: Sun Nov 5 06:27:48 2006
New Revision: 118492
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=118492
Log:
2006-11-05 Francois-Xavier Coudert [EMAIL PROTECTED],org
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29565
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-26 15:51 ---
I will submit the above patch tomorrow, time permitting (I am on the road right
now.).
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-25 07:18 ---
This fixes it but has not been regtested. I was hoping to have found a
slightly cleaner way to fix this but did not alight on anything that would not
be a big performance. It's OK for rank 1 arrays but for rank 2
