[Bug fortran/30437] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] -Wno-all is rejected (even when fortran is not included)

2007-01-25 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-25 21:15 --- Subject: Bug 30437 Author: manu Date: Thu Jan 25 21:15:34 2007 New Revision: 121186 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121186 Log: 2007-01-25 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/30437] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] -Wno-all is rejected (even when fortran is not included)

2007-01-17 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-01-17 19:46 --- Subject: Bug number PR 30437 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01456.html --

[Bug fortran/30437] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] -Wno-all is rejected (even when fortran is not included)

2007-01-15 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #6 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-01-16 01:00 --- Subject: Bug number PR 30437 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01267.html --

[Bug fortran/30437] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] -Wno-all is rejected (even when fortran is not included)

2007-01-14 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 11:13 --- Why Wall is not in common.opt ? As far as I know, that would be the right fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30437

[Bug fortran/30437] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] -Wno-all is rejected (even when fortran is not included)

2007-01-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 06:13 --- (In reply to comment #3) Although fortran may have a RejectNegative---in this case it's being rejected without fortran---so it's a separate bug that fortran rejects -Wno-all, IMO. Not really. 4.0.4 fails the same