http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39997
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 16:26 ---
Subject: Bug 39997
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Apr 6 16:26:02 2010
New Revision: 158008
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=158008
Log:
2010-04-06 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
PR
--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 16:37 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
New Revision: 158008
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=158008
Wrong PR. That's for coarrays which is PR 18918 ...
--
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-24 08:28 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
b) Implicit typing of procedure components:
This has been fixed in PR42045.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39997
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-16 20:53 ---
PR 41083 seems to be invalid (see quote there). I am not sure which parts
remain to be fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39997
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-16 12:21 ---
Tracking of the remaining items:
a) Implicit typing of external procedures in general: I filled PR 41083 for
this purpose.
b) Implicit typing of procedure components:
procedure pointer components are never
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-26 22:11 ---
Subject: Bug 39997
Author: janus
Date: Fri Jun 26 22:11:15 2009
New Revision: 148996
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=148996
Log:
2009-06-26 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-24 12:59 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Regarding the implicit typing: I think it would be easiest to apply the
implicit typing for
module m
external foo
end module m
at resolution time, such that foo is marked as ts.type
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-24 21:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=18062)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18062action=view)
Initial patch, somewhat working, but still many failures
Draft patch for item 1 and item 2 - still incomplete.
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-15 10:32 ---
Proc-pointer fun as written by Malcolm Cohen,
http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2009-May/002755.html
If I understood his arguments correctly, even the following Fortran 90 program
might be affected:
module m
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-11 22:56 ---
Now tracked as official Interpretation Request.
Request: http://www.j3-fortran.org/doc/year/09/09-236.txt (answer = proposed
answer by me).
Submitted for: J3 MEETING 189 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, August 10 - 14, 2009
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-04 07:11 ---
Wrong comp.lang.fortran link; the correct one is:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/b3a7e94ddf6b8ff3
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39997
12 matches
Mail list logo
