[Bug fortran/54070] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 --- Comment #29 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri Jan 15 20:33:58 2016 New Revision: 232450 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232450=gcc=rev Log: 2016-01-15 Paul Thomas PR fortran/64324 *

[Bug fortran/54070] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 --- Comment #28 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #27) > ...so ragged in fact that it fails at all levels of optimization I > have not had time these last days to come back to it and understand >

[Bug fortran/54070] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 --- Comment #27 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- ...so ragged in fact that it fails at all levels of optimization I have not had time these last days to come back to it and understand why. Something for the holidays! Paul On

[Bug fortran/54070] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/54070] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 --- Comment #25 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The regression (ICE) is caused by revision r188692 (pr53642). If I apply the following patch --- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c 2015-10-29 17:11:18.0 +0100 +++ gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c

[Bug fortran/54070] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 --- Comment #24 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The test in comment 23 looks like a duplicate of pr50221.

[Bug fortran/54070] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 --- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 66065 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/54070] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/54070] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||neil.n.carlson at gmail

[Bug fortran/54070] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 --- Comment #22 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > What is the status of this issue? It would appear from comment 18 > to be "fixed" insofar as the the provided examples compile, but is > the compiled code correct? This a wrong interpretation:

[Bug fortran/54070] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 --- Comment #23 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com --- Here's an even simpler example with the deferred length character array as a local variable -- not a function result or dummy argument. Sure seems as though the allocate statement itself

[Bug fortran/54070] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.0 Blocks|

[Bug fortran/54070] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 --- Comment #17 from Vittorio Zecca --- I found it fixed in 5.2.0

[Bug fortran/54070] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- GCC 4.9.3 has been released.

[Bug fortran/54070] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.3 |4.9.4