https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Dec 23 10:51:32 2014
New Revision: 219043
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219043root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-12-23 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Dec 23 19:06:23 2014
New Revision: 219047
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219047root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-12-23 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Ondřej Čertík from comment #14)
I tested it and it seems to be working! The code compiled with
non_overridable on.
Great. Thanks for checking.
There are run-time segfaults and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Dec 16 08:15:38 2014
New Revision: 218776
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218776root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-12-16 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/64244
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The bug should be fixed on trunk with r218776.
Ondrej, in case your test code is part of a larger code base, do you have the
possibility to test it with gfortran trunk?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #9 from Ondřej Čertík ondrej.certik at gmail dot com ---
Janus, thanks a lot for fixing this! Yes, it's part of a large code base. I'll
try the trunk soon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Ondřej Čertík from comment #9)
Janus, thanks a lot for fixing this!
You're welcome!
Yes, it's part of a large code base. I'll try the trunk soon.
That would be great. Since this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #11 from Ondřej Čertík ondrej.certik at gmail dot com ---
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 9:47 AM, janus at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #10 from janus at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Ondřej Čertík from comment #11)
So my system (RHEL6) libstdc++ library might be incompatible with the
trunk, but I don't see why gcc couldn't compile. Any ideas how to fix
this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #13 from Ondřej Čertík ondrej.certik at gmail dot com ---
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:46 PM, janus at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #12 from janus at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #14 from Ondřej Čertík ondrej.certik at gmail dot com ---
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:46 PM, janus at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.4
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
Likely r181107 for pr50919.
Yes, this commit (authored by myself) is definitely the culprit here.
The nontriviality in the given test case is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #4)
Here is a draft patch which does this (making the ICE disappear):
Regtests cleanly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrestelli at gmail dot com
17 matches
Mail list logo