https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2016-11-14 00:00:00 |2018-11-19
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #26 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Nov 9 17:29:33 2018
New Revision: 265979
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265979=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-09 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/78351
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #25 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Nov 9 17:07:39 2018
New Revision: 265976
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265976=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-09 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #24 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Nov 9 02:46:03 2018
New Revision: 265946
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265946=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-08 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/78351
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #23 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Final patch submitted for review.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-11/msg00017.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #22 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 44837
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44837=edit
Preliminary Patch
The attached patch appears to fix this. I am thinking about not doing the check
if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #19)
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:43:40AM +, kevin.b.beard at nasa dot gov
> wrote:
> > Many thanks to Jerry DeLisle [jvdeli...@charter.net]; he made us realize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #20 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 01:44:45AM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
>
> In the above, you are hitting an end-of-record. I would need
> to go read the Standard to see what happens in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #19 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:43:40AM +, kevin.b.beard at nasa dot gov wrote:
> Many thanks to Jerry DeLisle [jvdeli...@charter.net]; he made us realize
> that an internal record is now not treated the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #17 from Dr. Kevin B. Beard ---
Hi,
Many thanks to Jerry DeLisle [jvdeli...@charter.net]; he made us realize
that an internal record is now not treated the same as an external record! I
didn't think of that.
In the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #18 from Dr. Kevin B. Beard ---
Created attachment 40061
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40061=edit
x2.dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #16 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:36:58PM +, kevin.b.beard at nasa dot gov wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
>
> --- Comment #13 from Dr. Kevin B. Beard ---
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Well, on further investigation I see that we do have a flag in read_sf to
signal a comma. It does not have this flag in read_sf_internal, So definitely
does not work on strings. My bet is that when we/I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Try to find what you want in http://www.fortran.com/F77_std/rjcnf0001.html.
Good luck!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #13 from Dr. Kevin B. Beard ---
Hi,
Thanks for looking at this. I'm sorry to say I don't have access to the
official F77 standards,
perhaps you could send me a copy of the whole? The section you quoted doesn't
seems to
to exclude
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #12 from Dr. Kevin B. Beard ---
Hi,
Generally our (NASA's) legacy FORTRAN's READ's use no special flags
(IOSTAT=, ERR=, END=, etc.).
We have a huge amount of code going back to the early 1960's; some is an
eclectic mixture
of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10)
> > We are getting a segfault right after the error and the backtrace
> > is landing in the middle of read_block_direct, so the error recovery
> > is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> We are getting a segfault right after the error and the backtrace
> is landing in the middle of read_block_direct, so the error recovery
> is broken. Segfault is never acceptable so I will fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:21:05PM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> I just finished fixing another issue and am now looking at this one. Generally
> speaking if code worked before under g77, we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:51:41PM +, kevin.b.beard at nasa dot gov wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
>
> --- Comment #5 from Dr. Kevin B. Beard ---
> I've always understood
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Dr. Kevin B. Beard from comment #5)
> I've always understood that a comma will terminate a FORTRAN field - for
> example:
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #5 from Dr. Kevin B. Beard ---
I've always understood that a comma will terminate a FORTRAN field - for
example:
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19957-01/805-4939/z4000743a36d/index.html
Am I misunderstanding the F77 standard? Also,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
On 11/14/2016 11:09 AM, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
>
> kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
---
30 matches
Mail list logo
