https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85526
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85526
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 12:54:05AM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85526
>
> --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85526
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 08:03:35AM +, mail at pietrodelugas dot it wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85526
>
> --- Comment #4 from Pietro Delugas ---
> a quick and dirty workaround is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85526
--- Comment #4 from Pietro Delugas ---
a quick and dirty workaround is to move all the routines in the "leng"
interface at the bottom of the file. But some compilers do not accept this code
as valid.
A better solution is to move the leng
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85526
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85526
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:33:34PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> The code compiles with 6.4.0 and 7.3.0, but not with 6.4.1, 7.3.1,
> 8.0.1 and trunk (9.0). This is likely r258347 for gcc8,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85526
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
