https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86281
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Version|8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86281
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86281
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:36:04PM +, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> I don't know how this got past my regtesting...
>
> The regression on assumed_charlen_function_7.f90 was entirely my
> fault. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86281
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
Hi Rainer and Steve,
I don't know how this got past my regtesting...
The regression on assumed_charlen_function_7.f90 was entirely my fault. I found
the failure, corrected on my tree after saving the diff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86281
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jun 22 22:31:17 2018
New Revision: 261975
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261975=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-06-22 Paul Thomas
Rainer Orth
PR fortran/86281
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86281
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86281
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #1)
> Created attachment 44310 [details]
> proposed patch
Rainer,
Many, many thanks for taking care of this.
I know what the problem with assumed_charlen_function_7.f90
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86281
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86281
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 44310
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44310=edit
proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86281
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
10 matches
Mail list logo
