[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

2023-06-06 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||13.0 Target Milestone|12.4

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

2023-05-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.3|12.4 --- Comment #18 from Richard

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

2022-08-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.2|12.3 --- Comment #17 from Richard

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

2022-05-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.0|12.2 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

2021-12-31 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

2021-12-30 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 --- Comment #15 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Created attachment 52094 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52094=edit Tentative patch, adding IEEE_FMA and IEEE_SIGNBIT I am attaching a tentative patch for the issue. I also

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

2021-12-30 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |fxcoudert at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

2021-12-29 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 --- Comment #13 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to ally.alto.0z from comment #12) > Bill you say you are a “master engineer” and have 25 years of Fortran > experience and are a principal member of a Fortran committee. > > Would it be

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

2021-12-29 Thread ally.alto.0z at icloud dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 ally.alto.0z at icloud dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ally.alto.0z at icloud

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

2021-03-03 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 --- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 02:22:46AM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 > > --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- > It is very likely that the gcc

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

2021-03-03 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- It is very likely that the gcc optimizers will actually convert the to fma machine instructions, but no guarantee. I don't have much time, but it is likely some of the tricks we used in matmul can be used

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

2021-03-03 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 --- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #8) > > Short of someone diving in, there is always the kludge of ... > This is a better kludge, but is far from the correct approach as gfortran should use the

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

2021-03-03 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

2021-03-03 Thread longb at cray dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 --- Comment #7 from Bill Long --- Inquiry from the original site: "Does GCC provide a timeline for when they will conform to F2018?"

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

2021-01-22 Thread jvdelisle at charter dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at charter dot net ---

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

2021-01-22 Thread longb at cray dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 --- Comment #5 from Bill Long --- Original customer is asking again...

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

2020-10-05 Thread longb at cray dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 --- Comment #4 from Bill Long --- The customer has nuclear weapons. They do not do "bounty". :) Cray/HPE is just the messenger. I think they would be happy with a plan for including the routine.

[Bug fortran/95644] [F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing from the IEEE_ARITHMETIC module

2020-10-05 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|IEEE_FMA is missing from|[F2018] IEEE_FMA is missing