https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
--- Comment #26 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4d3d6343903f7ad79f0c70767bd106008fbfc346
commit r9-9161-g4d3d6343903f7ad79f0c70767bd106008fbfc346
Author: Paul Thomas
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
--- Comment #25 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b66dc7d363d26681113692f75ae9c033c12f3897
commit r9-9160-gb66dc7d363d26681113692f75ae9c033c12f3897
Author: Paul Thomas
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
--- Comment #24 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2b53f0afceb09d20fe02ac1a014d49075f098e5
commit r10-9232-gb2b53f0afceb09d20fe02ac1a014d49075f098e5
Author: Paul Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
--- Comment #23 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:316aa7ad19cd5b2dacba61bd7cc930449108abe5
commit r10-9231-g316aa7ad19cd5b2dacba61bd7cc930449108abe5
Author: Paul Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:863de9321813f947018cc60b06ba163ddcfbb5f2
commit r11-2535-g863de9321813f947018cc60b06ba163ddcfbb5f2
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
--- Comment #20 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
I got caught out by mime content blocking - trying again.
Paul
On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 09:26, Paul Richard Thomas <
paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks - this has been
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
--- Comment #19 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Thanks - this has been pointed out to me already by Dominique d'Humieres.
I'll fix tonight or tomorrow.
Paul
On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 at 23:46, ro at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #16)
> The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
>
Paul, I see you got the format just right. I stumbled on that part and then
decided to get
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e41da82345fb01c4c2641c979a94a975d15312ab
commit r11-2487-ge41da82345fb01c4c2641c979a94a975d15312ab
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
--- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl ---
Hi Paul,
Not sure how the UK is handling the pandemic. Here, in
Washington we have 4 phases. Phase 1 has the most
restrictions and phase 4 is the pandemic is over. Most
of Washington made it into phase 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
--- Comment #14 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Steve,
Your opinion of git and the change over to it is much the same as mine. I
have given it a go but had several "accidents" which put me off for a bit.
As for working on the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
--- Comment #13 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 02:54:59PM +, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas ---
> (In reply to kargl from comment #10)
> > (In reply to jvdelisle from comment #9)
> > > I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #10)
---snip---
> Thanks for testing. Does the patch that follows fix the regressions?
> gfortran treats components and type bound procedures separately. I've
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
--- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to jvdelisle from comment #9)
> I regression tested the patch in comment 8 and see these failures.
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr93423.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
> FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
jvdelisle at charter dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #8 from kargl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
--- Comment #7 from Kirill Chilikin ---
Result of git bisect:
$ git bisect log
git bisect start
# bad: [6e6e3f144a33ae504149dc992453b4f6dea12fdb] Update ChangeLog and version
files for release
git bisect bad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is a nasty bug, and I've run out of ideas on how to find a fix. :(
Simplified testcase
implicit none
type t2
integer r1
end type
type(t2) :: t
integer :: a
a =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-27
Ever
23 matches
Mail list logo
