[Bug java/41991] gcj segfaults on i686-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin9

2023-05-16 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41991 Bug 41991 depends on bug 44107, which changed state. Bug 44107 Summary: gcc emits frame (epilogue) info incompatible with the darwin {8,9}-unwinder,10-compacter https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107 What|Removed

[Bug java/41991] gcj segfaults on i686-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin9

2021-02-28 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41991 Bug 41991 depends on bug 44107, which changed state. Bug 44107 Summary: gcc emits frame (epilogue) info incompatible with the darwin {8,9}-unwinder,10-compacter https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107 What|Removed

[Bug java/41991] gcj segfaults on i686-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin9

2014-11-03 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41991 Bug 41991 depends on bug 44107, which changed state. Bug 44107 Summary: gcc emits frame (epilogue) info incompatible with the darwin {8,9}-unwinder,10-compacter https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107 What|Removed

[Bug java/41991] gcj segfaults on i686-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin9

2014-02-16 Thread jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41991 Jackie Rosen jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug java/41991] gcj segfaults on i686-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin9

2013-09-14 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41991 Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug java/41991] gcj segfaults on i686-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin9

2010-08-23 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #54 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-08-23 16:32 --- http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/libunwind/src/UnwindLevel1-gcc-ext.c contains the sources for the libunwind in darwin10 (which shows the aborting and

[Bug java/41991] gcj segfaults on i686-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin9

2010-08-21 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #53 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-08-22 04:56 --- gcc/unwind-dw2-fde-darwin.c only uses __deregister_frame_info_bases (image-fde); out of the non-functional unwinder calls for SL's libunwind. --

[Bug java/41991] gcj segfaults on i686-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin9

2010-08-20 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #50 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-08-21 00:31 --- According to the darwin unwinder maintainers in the Snow Leopard libunwind sources... // The following functions are implemented to just call abort _Unwind_GetDataRelBase _Unwind_GetTextRelBase

[Bug java/41991] gcj segfaults on i686-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin9

2010-08-20 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #51 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-08-21 00:55 --- An additional clarification from the darwin unwinder developers on the status of the libunwind sources from Snow Leopard... Everything down in the darwin layer is supposed to be open source. It was a

[Bug java/41991] gcj segfaults on i686-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin9

2010-08-20 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #52 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-08-21 02:24 --- Also the additional clarification that... The UnwindLevel1-gcc-ext.c source file in lldb is the same as in SnowLeopard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41991

[Bug java/41991] gcj segfaults on i686-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin9

2010-08-17 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #49 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 13:13 --- the patch attached to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg01249.html solves the problem by suppression of the epilogues in _eh_frames; the patch might be an incomplete solution to darwin-dwarf2 issues.

[Bug java/41991] gcj segfaults on i686-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin9

2010-08-11 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #44 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-11 12:32 --- I do not think the current solution is complete/correct. For 4.5.x and current trunk we still have a significant problem. (4.4.x apparently still works, as of 4.4.5/r163091, at least for trivial cases) [apollo is

[Bug java/41991] gcj segfaults on i686-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin9

2010-08-11 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #45 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-11 12:50 --- I no longer have time to work on this. -- andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/41991] gcj segfaults on i686-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin9

2010-08-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #46 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-08-11 13:14 --- (In reply to comment #44) I do not think the current solution is complete/correct. Don't confuse the darwin9 and darwin10 unwinder issues. They are different incompatiibilities with the darwin

[Bug java/41991] gcj segfaults on i686-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin9

2010-08-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #47 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-08-11 13:42 --- Also from a the darwin unwinder maintainer... I took a look at the bug report you made. Right off, I can tell that the problem is that _Unwind_FindEnclosingFunction() is not implemented. Well,

[Bug java/41991] gcj segfaults on i686-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin9

2010-08-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #48 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-08-11 15:23 --- These messages from the Apple developers also are useful in explaining the situation... http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-September/025894.html

[Bug java/41991] gcj segfaults on i686-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin9

2010-06-20 Thread gcc at ryandesign dot com
--- Comment #43 from gcc at ryandesign dot com 2010-06-20 06:57 --- Is there a reason the 3 fixes Andreas committed in February were not backported to the 4.4 branch? I just ran into Internal error: Abort trap (program ecj1) with 4.4.4 on Snow Leopard 10.6.4 and applying those patches

[Bug java/41991] gcj segfaults on i686-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin9

2010-02-02 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #42 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-02-03 03:33 --- Fixed on *-apple-darwin10. The gcj failures on intel darwin9 are due to a different unwinder bug. Leaving open for darwin9. -- howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu changed: What