https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83097
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83097
--- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Actually, I think it's for big endian we could optimize memcmp_char4. In the
example Thomas posted on the mailing list, one must also check the sign of
memcmp, not just whether it's != 0. Fixed example:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83097
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83097
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Wed Nov 22 19:19:13 2017
New Revision: 255072
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255072=gcc=rev
Log:
PR 83097 Use __BYTE_ORDER__ predefined macro instead of runtime check
By using the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83097
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
