https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107538
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.3|13.4
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107538
--- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski ---
Any progress on determining whether or not this is a valid assertion?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107538
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|13.3
--- Comment #5 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107538
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #4 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107538
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> #define _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
> #include
> #include
>
> int main()
> {
> double nan = std::numeric_limits::quiet_NaN();
> std::pow(10,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107538
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107538
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gdr at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107538
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Taken from https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?55547#comment0 but I don't think
anybody ever reported it here.
