[Bug libstdc++/108760] ranges::iota is not included in

2024-04-17 Thread mlevine55 at bloomberg dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108760 --- Comment #5 from Michael Levine --- I submitted a patch for this today, see either the gcc-patches or the libstdc++ mailing lists for the subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix std::ranges::iota is not included in numeric [PR108760]

[Bug libstdc++/108760] ranges::iota is not included in

2024-01-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108760 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Michael Levine from comment #2) > Should it not require including No, I don't see why. It's specified to be in . This looks like a simple bug, that's all.

[Bug libstdc++/108760] ranges::iota is not included in

2024-01-10 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108760 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler --- (In reply to Michael Levine from comment #2) > (In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #1) > > (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #0) > > > It seems wrong that libstdc++ needs to include for > > >

[Bug libstdc++/108760] ranges::iota is not included in

2024-01-10 Thread mlevine55 at bloomberg dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108760 Michael Levine changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mlevine55 at bloomberg dot net ---

[Bug libstdc++/108760] ranges::iota is not included in

2023-08-06 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108760 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug libstdc++/108760] ranges::iota is not included in

2023-02-11 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108760 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0