http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24025
Jonathan Larmour jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24025
xiaoyuanbo xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah
--- Comment #9 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-10-23 16:26 ---
The issue seems more tricky, even for TLS platforms, see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg00333.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24025
--- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-12-02 17:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=10391)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10391action=view)
Trivial testcase
Hi. I'm attaching a trivial testcase (*). In fact, I consider this bug pretty
serious! Howard, any
--- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-12-02 17:50 ---
Sorry. Actually the testcase is not correct stand-alone, fails at line 13. I'm
currently checking whether is correct when the testsuite support (memory
limits) is present.
--
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-12-02 17:51 ---
... possibly using a real memory allocation, touching all the involved pages.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24025
--- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-12-02 18:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=10392)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10392action=view)
Puzzling testcase...
Humm, strange. The new testcase *passes*... Still, the original analysis makes
a lot of sense to
--- Comment #7 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-12-02 18:07 ---
Ah! Now I see, it's because of Benjamin and Ulrich recent changes, involving
thread local storage. Therefore my amended testcase proposal should be fine on
platforms not defining _GLIBCXX_HAVE_TLS. We should check that.
--- Comment #8 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-12-02 18:13 ---
If my analysis is correct, this PR is still valid *only* for targets not
defining _GLIBCXX_HAVE_TLS. Otherwise, fixed by:
2005-11-21 Benjamin Kosnik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ulrich Drepper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-09-23 09:45
---
Adding Rth in CC as the author of the fix of libstdc++/10606, which added the
call of __cxa_get_globals from __cxa_allocate_exception
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-22
23:04 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
11 matches
Mail list logo
