--- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-09-12 08:28 ---
Basing on Martin' comments, I think this PR should bu suspended, waiting for
the outcome of DR 309 (certainly directly relevant).
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from jimrees at itasoftware dot com 2006-09-11 21:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=12228)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12228action=view)
bug reproducer program
bug reproducer, compile with g++ - any flags, but do not disable exceptions.
--
--- Comment #2 from jimrees at itasoftware dot com 2006-09-11 21:10 ---
fyi, a real world example of how this comes up? Construct a std::ifstream
using a pathname to a directory instead of a file. Under Linux and MacOS at
least, the basic_filebuf code is happy to open such a
--- Comment #3 from sebor at roguewave dot com 2006-09-11 21:25 ---
This sounds like it might be related to
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#309. If so, and if
this case is important to you (the submitter) it might be helpful to give the
committee a little
--- Comment #4 from jimrees at itasoftware dot com 2006-09-11 22:23 ---
Sure, the issue sounds interesting, and the committee's resolution statement is
definitely lame. Bug issue 309 seems to be more about what is _specified_
about sentry::sentry()'s behavior, and I don't necessarily
--- Comment #5 from sebor at roguewave dot com 2006-09-12 00:16 ---
The reason why I think library issue 309 may be relevant is because while the
arithmetic extraction operator() is a formatted input function (and thus
subject to 27.6.1.1, p4, and required to begin by constructing a
