[Bug libstdc++/69699] libstdc++ ABI documentation is out of date

2017-05-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu May 18 15:31:02 2017 New Revision: 248232 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248232=gcc=rev Log: PR69699 document why __GLIBCXX__ macro is useless Backport from mainline

[Bug libstdc++/69699] libstdc++ ABI documentation is out of date

2017-05-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu May 18 14:35:12 2017 New Revision: 248210 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248210=gcc=rev Log: PR69699 document why __GLIBCXX__ macro is useless Backport from mainline

[Bug libstdc++/69699] libstdc++ ABI documentation is out of date

2017-01-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/69699] libstdc++ ABI documentation is out of date

2017-01-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Jan 17 15:26:11 2017 New Revision: 244532 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244532=gcc=rev Log: PR69699 document why __GLIBCXX__ macro is useless PR libstdc++/69699

[Bug libstdc++/69699] libstdc++ ABI documentation is out of date

2017-01-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/69699] libstdc++ ABI documentation is out of date

2016-05-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- There is no such macro.

[Bug libstdc++/69699] libstdc++ ABI documentation is out of date

2016-02-07 Thread bastian.beisc...@rwth-aachen.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699 --- Comment #3 from bastian.beisc...@rwth-aachen.de --- Jonathan, maybe so but it should be mentioned on the page nevertheless, right? My issue is that we are using (as an example): #if (defined(__GLIBCXX__) && __GLIBCXX__ > 20150626) ||

[Bug libstdc++/69699] libstdc++ ABI documentation is out of date

2016-02-07 Thread bastian.beisc...@rwth-aachen.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699 --- Comment #5 from bastian.beisc...@rwth-aachen.de --- Thanks for your comments. Does this mean that such a macro does not exist at the present time?

[Bug libstdc++/69699] libstdc++ ABI documentation is out of date

2016-02-07 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to bastian.beischer from comment #3) > Jonathan, maybe so but it should be mentioned on the page nevertheless, > right? Yes, although I plan to deprecate that macro. > My issue is that we are

[Bug libstdc++/69699] libstdc++ ABI documentation is out of date

2016-02-06 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- That macro is fairly useless.

[Bug libstdc++/69699] libstdc++ ABI documentation is out of date

2016-02-05 Thread bastian.beisc...@rwth-aachen.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699 --- Comment #1 from bastian.beisc...@rwth-aachen.de --- This is a list of all the missing values of the __GLIBCXX__ macro 4.7.3 20130411 4.7.4 20140612 4.8.0 20130322 4.8.1 20130531 4.8.2 20131016 4.8.3 20140522 4.8.4 20141219 4.8.5 20150623