https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395
--- Comment #7 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ville
Date: Wed Aug 31 12:38:05 2016
New Revision: 239890
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239890=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/77395
* include/std/type_traits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395
--- Comment #6 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Fixed on trunk, backporting to the gcc-6 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395
--- Comment #5 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ville
Date: Tue Aug 30 18:46:11 2016
New Revision: 239870
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239870=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/77395
* include/std/type_traits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395
--- Comment #4 from Ville Voutilainen ---
And now the hopefully final patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg01990.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395
--- Comment #3 from Johannes S. Mueller-Roemer ---
(In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #1)
> I think a better test-case is the following one, which does not depend on
> tuple at all:
>
> //#
> #include
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395
--- Comment #2 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Right, patch available at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg01983.html
Currently fixing negative test failures for it...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
10 matches
Mail list logo