[Bug libstdc++/81064] [8 Regression] Inline namespace regression

2017-07-23 Thread fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81064 François Dumont changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/81064] [8 Regression] Inline namespace regression

2017-07-23 Thread fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81064 --- Comment #6 from François Dumont --- Author: fdumont Date: Sun Jul 23 08:41:35 2017 New Revision: 250458 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250458=gcc=rev Log: 2017-07-23 François Dumont PR libstdc++/81064

[Bug libstdc++/81064] [8 Regression] Inline namespace regression

2017-06-12 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81064 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Maybe we could take this opportunity to get rid of most of the __8 namespaces and only have std::__8 and __gnu_cxx::__8, rather than std::__8 and numerous std::xxx::__8 namespaces. That would simplify the

[Bug libstdc++/81064] [8 Regression] Inline namespace regression

2017-06-12 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81064 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- We have this structure in libstdc++: namespace std { inline namespace __8 { } inline namespace literals { inline namespace chrono_literals { inline namespace __8 { } } inline namespace

[Bug libstdc++/81064] [8 Regression] Inline namespace regression

2017-06-12 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81064 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|rejects-valid | Status|ASSIGNED