https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114437
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #7 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114437
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
You can juse use "+mr" without the comma. There is no way to use alterantives
in inline-asm.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114437
xog4n...@a-n.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |INVALID
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114437
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114437
--- Comment #3 from xog4n...@a-n.cc ---
Just to confirm, is this an incorrect constraint for the intended goal of
convincing the compiler that the value is used and modified, without actually
doing either and preserving the value, or am I just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114437
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114437
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
"+m" does not do what you think it does ...