--- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-03 06:35 ---
Subject: Bug 32176
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 3 06:35:05 2007
New Revision: 126245
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=126245
Log:
PR middle-end/32176
* gcc.dg/pr32176.c: New test.
--- Comment #13 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-07-03 06:40 ---
Closed as magically fixed (testcase was committed to SVN mainline).
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-02 19:09 ---
I cannot reproduce this on x86_64 with any of the testcases.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32176
--- Comment #10 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-07-02 19:39 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
I cannot reproduce this on x86_64 with any of the testcases.
Looks like this bug has 'fixed' itself somewhere during the last two weeks ...
can't reproduce it either
--
--- Comment #11 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-07-02 20:43 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
I cannot reproduce this on x86_64 with any of the testcases.
Looks like this bug has 'fixed' itself somewhere during the last two weeks
...
can't reproduce it
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 20:21
---
I can reproduce this 4.3 regression with the following C testcase:
$ cat w.c
void foo (void)
{
int i, m;
float xa[21];
m = 0;
while (1)
{
i = 0;
while (1)
{
if (xa[(long int)i] ==
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-18 06:42 ---
There is a cast which confuses SCEV.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-12 15:44
---
(In reply to comment #1)
While the assert is occurs in the middle end, I think it is very likely a
tree-type mismatch in the front end.
I think it is. It also fails for me on i686-darwin, with -O2
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-07 08:39 ---
Compilation works for me with:
gcc-Version 4.3.0 20070607 x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32176
--- Comment #5 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-06-07 09:32 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Compilation works for me with:
gcc-Version 4.3.0 20070607 x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
still failing for me with a compiler a few minutes old:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/g95 cat
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-01 07:49 ---
While the assert is occurs in the middle end, I think it is very likely a
tree-type mismatch in the front end.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-01 11:23 ---
#2 0x00a30ddc in int_cst_value (x=0x2b8d9ea73780)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/tree.c:7720
7720 unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT val = TREE_INT_CST_LOW (x);
(gdb) call debug_generic_expr (x)
(int8)
12 matches
Mail list logo