[Bug middle-end/45589] [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled

2010-09-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09 09:52 --- Was a dup (fixed). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 45578 *** -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/45589] [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled

2010-09-08 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-08 06:55 --- This pr could be a duplicate of pr45578. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45589

[Bug middle-end/45589] [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled

2010-09-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 09:22 --- Mine. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/45589] [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled

2010-09-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-07 22:25 --- Revision 163963 is bad. Revision 163913 is OK. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45589

[Bug middle-end/45589] [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled

2010-09-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-08 00:18 --- It is caused by revision 163915: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00207.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/45589] [4.6 Regression] 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000 is miscompiled

2010-09-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-08 00:29 --- I used -O3 -funroll-loops -ffast-math on Linux/x86-64. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45589