[Bug middle-end/45644] [4.6 Regression] 450.soplex in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

2012-01-09 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45644 --- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-09 18:40:17 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon Jan 9 18:40:09 2012 New Revision: 183023 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183023 Log: 2012-01-09 Martin

[Bug middle-end/45644] [4.6 Regression] 450.soplex in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

2012-01-09 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45644 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nobled at

[Bug middle-end/45644] [4.6 Regression] 450.soplex in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

2011-02-21 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45644 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mbooth at redhat

[Bug middle-end/45644] [4.6 Regression] 450.soplex in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

2010-09-15 Thread vladimir dot a dot kharchenko at intel dot com
--- Comment #5 from vladimir dot a dot kharchenko at intel dot com 2010-09-15 10:11 --- When I run ./soplex -s1 -e -m45000 pds-50.mps Seg fault is: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x004363a7 in size (this=0x7fffce40, ds=value optimized out) at

[Bug middle-end/45644] [4.6 Regression] 450.soplex in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

2010-09-15 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-15 13:25 --- I have just sent a proposed fix to the mailing list: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01244.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45644

[Bug middle-end/45644] [4.6 Regression] 450.soplex in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

2010-09-15 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-15 16:00 --- Subject: Bug 45644 Author: jamborm Date: Wed Sep 15 15:59:27 2010 New Revision: 164313 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164313 Log: 2010-09-15 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz PR

[Bug middle-end/45644] [4.6 Regression] 450.soplex in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

2010-09-15 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-15 16:06 --- Fixed. -- jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/45644] [4.6 Regression] 450.soplex in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

2010-09-14 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-14 15:02 --- I can reproduce the problem and it does not happen with -fno-ipa-sra = mine. -- jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/45644] [4.6 Regression] 450.soplex in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

2010-09-14 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-14 17:54 --- The miscompiled file appears to be spxweightst.o, the miscompilation probably happens when transforming a call to int soplex::DataSetDATA::number(const soplex::DataKey) const [with DATA = soplex::SVSet::DLPSV] --

[Bug middle-end/45644] [4.6 Regression] 450.soplex in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

2010-09-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-11 00:20 --- It is caused by revision 164135: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00427.html I got *** glibc detected *** ../run_base_test_lnx32e-gcc./soplex_base.lnx32e-gcc: double free or corruption (out):

[Bug middle-end/45644] [4.6 Regression] 450.soplex in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

2010-09-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-11 00:23 --- It also failed with -DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -O2 -ffast-math -DSPEC_CPU_LP64 -fno-strict-aliasing -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45644