https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #22 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023, eggert at cs dot ucla.edu via Gcc-bugs wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
>
> --- Comment #20 from Paul Eggert ---
> (In reply to jos...@codes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #20 from Paul Eggert ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #14)
> This is just the same as other unspecified things like converting an
> out-of-range value from floating-point to integer.
No, because when GCC's consta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eggert at cs dot ucla.edu
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joshua.england@worldprogram
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #17 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu ---
(In reply to lucier from comment #16)
> Created attachment 52026 [details]
> CPU and Memorty usage reports for compilling all.i, _num.i, and compiler.i
Sorry, added comment to wrong PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #16 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu ---
Created attachment 52026
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52026&action=edit
CPU and Memorty usage reports for compilling all.i, _num.i, and compiler.i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #14 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-12-08 22:32:24 UTC ---
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, lucier at math dot purdue.edu wrote:
> Indeed, I couldn't find a place in the gcc sources where this macro was
> used:
>
> heine:~/programs/gcc/m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #13 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2011-12-08 20:54:18 UTC ---
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 20:37 +, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
>
> --- Comment #12 from joseph at codesou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-12-08 20:37:11 UTC ---
I think the soft-fp code tries to generate particular target-specific NaNs
because it's also used in the Linux kernel emulation of floating-point
instructions - whic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #10 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2011-12-08 18:32:56 UTC ---
Near the end of section 5.3.2 of
Book E:
Enhanced PowerPC Architecture
Version 1.0
May 7, 2002
it says
Any instruction that generates a QNaN as the result of a disab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #9 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2011-12-08 17:05:43 UTC ---
Table 4.7 of the
AMD64 Architecture Programmer’s Manual Volume 1:
Application Programming
has a footnote 3 that says
3. The floating-point indefinite value is a QNaN w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-12-08
16:06:43 UTC ---
> Does IEEE say anything about the sign of the qnan?
>From "Draft 1.2.5 DRAFT Standard for Floating-Point Arithmetic P754 October 4,
2006" at
http://www.validlab.com/754R/draft
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #6 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2011-12-08 14:31:23 UTC ---
PS: I don't know whether IEEE says anything about the sign bit, but I doubt
it.
Brad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #5 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2011-12-08 14:30:00 UTC ---
Re:
Do the architecture manuals say anything about the sign of the qnan?
Amazingly enough, they do!
I downloaded the combined x86-64 manuals from
http://www.intel.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
19 matches
Mail list logo