[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

2013-01-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08 08:33:50 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 8 08:33:43 2013 New Revision: 195007 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195007 Log: PR

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

2013-01-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

2013-01-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 14:51:26 UTC --- I don't see any differences in assembly, when I compile either version of random.i with -std=gnu99 -fcx-fortran-rules -g -O2 with a r189365 vs. r189366

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

2013-01-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 16:34:14 UTC --- Ah, ok, seems indeed to be HWI size related and also (due to an earlier bug) related to the revision you've mentioned. So, with an i686-linux -

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

2013-01-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 17:27:56 UTC --- Created attachment 29100 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29100 gcc48-pr54120.patch So, I wrote a fix against r189366, only to

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

2013-01-07 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 --- Comment #13 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-01-07 18:09:29 UTC --- On 1/7/2013 12:27 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: I'd say after with r194800 or later you shouldn't get this failure. Yes, the failure is gone. So, PR can be

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

2012-12-22 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 --- Comment #5 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-22 23:00:21 UTC --- As might have been expected, libgfortran/random.o differs between revisions 189365 and 189366. Even in the .i files, there are many differences.

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

2012-12-22 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 --- Comment #6 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-22 23:01:46 UTC --- Created attachment 29031 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29031 .s file difference

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

2012-12-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-22 23:06:42 UTC --- Can you please attach random.i and what exact gcc options were used to compile random.c ?

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

2012-12-22 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 --- Comment #8 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-22 23:35:02 UTC --- Created attachment 29032 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29032 Preprocessed source from r189366 Compilation command:

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

2012-12-22 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 --- Comment #9 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-22 23:38:11 UTC --- Created attachment 29033 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29033 Preprocessed source from r189365

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

2012-12-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

2012-12-19 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-12-19 12:58:32 UTC --- On 19-Dec-12, at 5:54 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Or is it libgfortran itself that when built with r189365 works and when r189366 doesn't? If so,

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

2012-09-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug middle-end/54120] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/random_2.f90 execution

2012-07-31 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc