http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55478
Matt Hargett changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55478
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|hubicka at gcc dot g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55478
--- Comment #11 from Matt Hargett 2013-02-14 21:27:54 UTC
---
Attached is an updated version of the tests Maxim committed to the google/4_7
branch. The only difference is that more of the tests are xfail'd than in the
older google branch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55478
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener 2013-02-11
08:45:31 UTC ---
Note a testcase should still be added to the testsuite.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55478
--- Comment #9 from Matt Hargett 2013-02-11 02:02:46 UTC
---
Just tested with latest trunk and it passes at -O3. With Maxim's previous
devirt patches, it passed at -O2. That being said, I'm happy and this can be
marked as RESOLVED.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55478
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener 2012-12-13
10:46:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> As for the PRE issue - we indeed seem to not release SSA temporaries
> created by PRE. I'll look into that.
Fixed with
2012-12-13 Richard Bie
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55478
--- Comment #7 from Matt Hargett 2012-11-27 17:32:01 UTC
---
I'll rewrite the test to add a loop that hopefully triggers it as hot at -O3
(and gets unrolled). shouldn't it inline at -O2 since DCE would eliminate the
function body and make
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55478
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2012-11-27
14:35:39 UTC ---
Hmm, OK. I wonder how google's branch handles this correctly...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55478
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2012-11-27
13:39:57 UTC ---
Well, the loop isn't unrolled until late cunroll after which there is no
SRA / FRE to fix things up. No, DOM doesn't get it by implementation
limitation.
As for the PRE iss
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55478
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55478
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2012-11-27
10:55:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 28792
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28792
patch
This is patch I am going to test. It copies open64' notion of heavy calls -
i.e. the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55478
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Jan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55478
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
13 matches
Mail list logo
