[Bug middle-end/70879] Missed jump threading opportunity with multiple != conditions

2017-08-19 Thread amacleod at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70879 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod --- oops, wasnt meant to actually attach that note to this PR.

[Bug middle-end/70879] Missed jump threading opportunity with multiple != conditions

2017-08-18 Thread amacleod at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70879 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod --- On 08/18/2017 06:13 PM, law at redhat dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70879 > > Jeffrey A. Law changed: > > What|Removed |Added >

[Bug middle-end/70879] Missed jump threading opportunity with multiple != conditions

2017-08-18 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70879 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/70879] Missed jump threading opportunity with multiple != conditions

2016-07-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70879 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug middle-end/70879] Missed jump threading opportunity with multiple != conditions

2016-05-02 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70879 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Which is the problem Andrew has started poking at :-) One of the paths being explored is creating those PHIs.

[Bug middle-end/70879] Missed jump threading opportunity with multiple != conditions

2016-05-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70879 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/70879] Missed jump threading opportunity with multiple != conditions

2016-04-29 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70879 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com --- Comment