https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Hans-Peter Nilsson :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58fe131b91007793c0f12f5fe6cab3f1a017d0fa
commit r11-8204-g58fe131b91007793c0f12f5fe6cab3f1a017d0fa
Author: Hans-Peter Nilsson
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #21 from John David Anglin ---
Still present on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #20 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-07-08 6:04 a.m., amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Created attachment 46577
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46577=edit
> patch for aligned stack - but clamping
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #19 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-07-07 8:39 p.m., amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> It seems suspicious that PREFERRED_STACK_BOUNDARY is smaller for TARGET_64BIT
> ?
That's the way HP defined things. The preferred
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #46574|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #17 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #15 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
> Created attachment 46574
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46574=edit
> patch for the case that the stack is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #16 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke from comment #13)
> I tried if I could reproduce this with a cross-compiler built for
> --target=hppa-linux-gnu;
My target of concern is cris-elf, just as in my
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #15 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
Created attachment 46574
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46574=edit
patch for the case that the stack is sufficiently aligned
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #11)
> $sp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #14 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 46573
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46573=edit
Preproccessed source for pr84877.c
I don't believe there are any new failures or ICEs on hppa-linux with your
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #13 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #12)
> (In reply to Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke from comment #10)
> > Created attachment 46567 [details]
> > Fix for targets that pass the argument by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke from comment #10)
> Created attachment 46567 [details]
> Fix for targets that pass the argument by invisible reference
Thanks for your efforts. This *may* have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #11 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2019-07-06 3:39 p.m., amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Since the esirisc port is not in the FSF tree, it doesn't really count for
> testing; also, the behaviour will vary depending on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 10 15:44:16 2019
New Revision: 267812
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267812=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/84877
PR bootstrap/88450
* function.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #4 from Renlin Li ---
Author: renlin
Date: Wed Nov 21 14:29:19 2018
New Revision: 266345
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266345=gcc=rev
Log:
[PATCH][PR84877]Dynamically align the address for local parameter copy on the
stack
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
I think GCC needs to copy P0 to a properly aligned stack slot in the prologue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-none-eabi
22 matches
Mail list logo
