https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42980
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42980
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42980
--- Comment #15 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-22
21:35:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Seems fixed. If so, please close. If not, please summarize remaining issues.
The patches in comments #8 and #10 are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42980
--- Comment #16 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com 2011-06-22 22:19:07
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15) Ralf W. wrote (in part)
I'm not sure if there are other problems with parallel install, but at that
time I didn't see any others at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42980
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot
--- Comment #13 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-02 06:10 ---
Subject: Bug 42980
Author: rwild
Date: Tue Mar 2 06:09:56 2010
New Revision: 157159
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=157159
Log:
Small multilib rule fixups.
libgcc/:
PR other/42980
--- Comment #11 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-28 09:57 ---
Patches posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg01236.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42980
--- Comment #12 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-02-28 10:41 ---
*** Bug 38388 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pluto at agmk dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-24 22:15 ---
Thank you very much for the logs, and the note that install-target-libiberty
alone wasn't sufficient to provoke a race, that provided the needed clue.
Please try the following three patches (split up because they're
--- Comment #8 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-24 22:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=19953)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19953action=view)
properly propagate (parallel) make flags in libgcc install rule
--
--- Comment #9 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-24 22:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=19954)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19954action=view)
Fix parallel libiberty install failure
This patch should fix the bulk of the failures, and is hopefully simple
--- Comment #10 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-24 22:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=19955)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19955action=view)
Changes proposed for automake-generated files (pending upstream fix)
This patch is just a diff against files
--- Comment #6 from gary at intrepid dot com 2010-02-22 17:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=19936)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19936action=view)
parallel make -j6 install failure logs
Attached, a collection of install logs run with SHELL=/bin/sh -x, where the
--- Comment #5 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-21 16:13 ---
Thanks for the logs. I don't understand the libiberty installation failure
yet. Can you please run the following, and provide the log file and the number
of runs needed, in case it provokes a failure?
while make
--- Comment #3 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-08 18:18 ---
Can you make a bit more of the output of such a failed install available,
say, about 50 lines around each of the two different failures?
Wrt. the failure with headers, it seems GNU coreutils install does not
allow
--- Comment #4 from gary at intrepid dot com 2010-02-08 23:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=19827)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19827action=view)
Log excerpts of parallel make install failures
Excerpts from parallel install (ie, make -j6 install) failures. Each
16 matches
Mail list logo
