http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54800
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 18:36:01
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I think the correct patch is the following, but I have no way to test it.
this looks fine for all darwin,
I've tested it on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54800
--- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04
19:00:15 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jan 4 19:00:06 2013
New Revision: 194914
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194914
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54800
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54800
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54800
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2012-10-03
21:22:31 UTC ---
Or if you want something that compiles
memset (namebuf[MACH_O_NAME_LEN], 0, MACH_O_NAME_LEN + 2);
might be closer ;-
