http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176
--- Comment #22 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2013-01-20 06:16:21
UTC ---
I must have been looking at something else; the 4.6 and trunk loops are
effectively the same, so this is no longer a regression.
We might will want the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16
11:22:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 29177
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29177
gcc48-pr50176.patch
Are you sure about it? For me on the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27
13:56:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 27711
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27711
gcc48-pr50176.patch
Here is an untested patch (hacked up on 4.7 branch, as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27
15:28:52 UTC ---
Ah, the i386.md part doesn't apply on the trunk, since
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184891
which seems to have fixed this issue for the case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
---
