[Bug rtl-optimization/55342] [4.8 Regression] [LRA,x86] Non-optimal code for simple loop with LRA

2013-02-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55342 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug rtl-optimization/55342] [4.8 Regression] [LRA,x86] Non-optimal code for simple loop with LRA

2013-01-28 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55342 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2

[Bug rtl-optimization/55342] [4.8 Regression] [LRA,x86] Non-optimal code for simple loop with LRA

2012-12-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55342 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug rtl-optimization/55342] [4.8 Regression] [LRA,x86] Non-optimal code for simple loop with LRA

2012-11-19 Thread ysrumyan at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55342 --- Comment #2 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com 2012-11-19 12:06:20 UTC --- The patching compiler produces better binaries but we still have -6% performance degradation on corei7. The main cause of it it that LRA compiler

[Bug rtl-optimization/55342] [4.8 Regression] [LRA,x86] Non-optimal code for simple loop with LRA

2012-11-17 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55342 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-17 17:59:41 UTC --- Author: vmakarov Date: Sat Nov 17 17:59:35 2012 New Revision: 193588 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193588 Log: