https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70174
Dominik Vogt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70174
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70174
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 11 12:07:01 2016
New Revision: 234137
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234137=gcc=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/70174
* expmed.c (store_bit_field_using_insv):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70174
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> > Though, aarch64 ICEs in the same place, so this is likely not an i386
> > backend issue.
>
> This is an issue with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70174
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> Comment on attachment 37931 [details]
> gcc6-pr70174.patch
>
> + tmp = gen_lowpart (op_mode, force_reg (GET_MODE (value),
> +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70174
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Comment on attachment 37931
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37931
gcc6-pr70174.patch
+ tmp = gen_lowpart (op_mode, force_reg (GET_MODE (value),
+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70174
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70174
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Though, aarch64 ICEs in the same place, so this is likely not an i386
> backend issue.
Though the revision where the failure starts says something about what to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70174
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Though, aarch64 ICEs in the same place, so this is likely not an i386
> backend issue.
This is an issue with insv handling infrastructure. The problem is in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70174
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, aarch64 ICEs in the same place, so this is likely not an i386 backend
issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70174
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
11 matches
Mail list logo