[Bug sanitizer/78307] [7 Regression] missing symbols in libubsan without changing the soname

2016-11-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/78307] [7 Regression] missing symbols in libubsan without changing the soname

2016-11-18 Thread m.ostapenko at samsung dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307 --- Comment #9 from Maxim Ostapenko --- Can we close this?

[Bug sanitizer/78307] [7 Regression] missing symbols in libubsan without changing the soname

2016-11-16 Thread chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307 --- Comment #8 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: chefmax Date: Wed Nov 16 11:13:19 2016 New Revision: 242478 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242478=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/78307 * ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cc

[Bug sanitizer/78307] [7 Regression] missing symbols in libubsan without changing the soname

2016-11-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #6) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > > (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #4) > > > But LLVM doesn't support shared UBSan runtime (the only one

[Bug sanitizer/78307] [7 Regression] missing symbols in libubsan without changing the soname

2016-11-11 Thread m.ostapenko at samsung dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307 --- Comment #6 from Maxim Ostapenko --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #4) > > But LLVM doesn't support shared UBSan runtime (the only one supported is > > ASan) and AFAIK there aren't any

[Bug sanitizer/78307] [7 Regression] missing symbols in libubsan without changing the soname

2016-11-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #4) > But LLVM doesn't support shared UBSan runtime (the only one supported is > ASan) and AFAIK there aren't any plans to support it there. Yeah, it is a very

[Bug sanitizer/78307] [7 Regression] missing symbols in libubsan without changing the soname

2016-11-11 Thread m.ostapenko at samsung dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307 --- Comment #4 from Maxim Ostapenko --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Sure, it doesn't affect gcc emitted code unless somebody calls those > directly, but perhaps say llvm compiled code using the shared libubsan.so. But LLVM

[Bug sanitizer/78307] [7 Regression] missing symbols in libubsan without changing the soname

2016-11-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Sure, it doesn't affect gcc emitted code unless somebody calls those directly, but perhaps say llvm compiled code using the shared libubsan.so. In any case, we shouldn't be making ABI incompatible changes

[Bug sanitizer/78307] [7 Regression] missing symbols in libubsan without changing the soname

2016-11-11 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose --- I can't tell. I was just looking at symbol difference in the library, like using the abigail tools.

[Bug sanitizer/78307] [7 Regression] missing symbols in libubsan without changing the soname

2016-11-11 Thread m.ostapenko at samsung dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307 Maxim Ostapenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m.ostapenko at samsung dot com ---

[Bug sanitizer/78307] [7 Regression] missing symbols in libubsan without changing the soname

2016-11-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ABI Priority|P3