https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #23 from Kewen Lin ---
*** Bug 105267 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by HaoChen Gui :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0580ea4b7a6dc8ee981b08f936b3ce62c6dfe200
commit r13-6981-g0580ea4b7a6dc8ee981b08f936b3ce62c6dfe200
Author: Haochen Gui
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #20 from HaoChen Gui ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #19)
> Hi guys,
>
> What testcases are still failing? I'm a bit lost :-)
pr56605.c is still not fixed.
+FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c scan-rtl-dump-times
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #19 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Hi guys,
What testcases are still failing? I'm a bit lost :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d99d74d8b1b517784e3b05b271b977eb6603121f
commit r10-10948-gd99d74d8b1b517784e3b05b271b977eb6603121f
Author: Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72cf56c7cfefaf1b074bb70e42890cf1191c46a1
commit r11-10208-g72cf56c7cfefaf1b074bb70e42890cf1191c46a1
Author: Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2eb21e7349cda2885438463f045f6729a47039e8
commit r11-10207-g2eb21e7349cda2885438463f045f6729a47039e8
Author: Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #15 from HaoChen Gui ---
As r12-8128 was revoked, failure of pr56605.c is still not fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #14 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #13)
> What's the status of these test cases now, given all of the fizes applied so
> far? Can we marked this as FIXED?
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #13 from Peter Bergner ---
What's the status of these test cases now, given all of the fizes applied so
far? Can we marked this as FIXED?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:748d46cd049c89a799f99f14547267ebae915af6
commit r12-8222-g748d46cd049c89a799f99f14547267ebae915af6
Author: Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:26fa464f42622c60d6929720dd37143a21054ede
commit r12-8221-g26fa464f42622c60d6929720dd37143a21054ede
Author: Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #10 from HaoChen Gui ---
(In reply to HaoChen Gui from comment #9)
> Could you backport the patch to GCC11? Thanks.
Please ignore it as the patch has problem. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #9 from HaoChen Gui ---
Could you backport the patch to GCC11? Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.3|11.4
Priority|P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b7cc7294770ecb57c0f3a116a27ce1aaff170b5
commit r12-8128-g6b7cc7294770ecb57c0f3a116a27ce1aaff170b5
Author: Alexandre Oliva
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #5 from HaoChen Gui ---
For prefix-no-update.c, the patch Segher proposed in PR103197 could fix it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #4 from HaoChen Gui ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> What's the status on the remaining failures?
For pr56605.c，I already submitted a patch. Waiting for review.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
--- Comment #1 from HaoChen Gui ---
For pr81348.c, it was already fixed by r11-8941. Segher backported it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952#c12
PASS: gcc.target/powerpc/pr81348.c (test for excess errors)
PASS:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
24 matches
Mail list logo
