https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
--- Comment #15 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Sat Apr 16 23:22:52 2016
New Revision: 235066
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235066=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-04-16 Sandra Loosemore
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
--- Comment #13 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Thu Jan 7 18:02:25 2016
New Revision: 232136
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232136=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-01-07 Sandra Loosemore
PR 1078
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
--- Comment #14 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've finished going through the target-specific attributes. I filed new
target-specific issues for things that need attention from target maintainers:
PR 69151: h8300 "OS_Task", "monitor"
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
--- Comment #10 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Tue Jan 5 18:04:01 2016
New Revision: 232081
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232081=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-01-05 Sandra Loosemore
PR 1078
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
--- Comment #11 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Tue Jan 5 19:45:43 2016
New Revision: 232085
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232085=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-01-05 Sandra Loosemore
PR 1078
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
--- Comment #12 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Tue Jan 5 20:51:48 2016
New Revision: 232092
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232092=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-01-05 Sandra Loosemore
PR 1078
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
--- Comment #8 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Sat Jan 2 03:45:32 2016
New Revision: 232034
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232034=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-01-01 Sandra Loosemore
PR 1078
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
--- Comment #9 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
"no_stack_limit" is documented now.
I've proposed deleting "com_interface", as it's been obsolete since 2001:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg00011.html
It looks like the only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
---
--- Comment #6 from eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com 2007-09-04 03:37
---
(In reply to comment #5)
Patch to document AVR progmem attribute:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg01832.html
Now committed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg00159.html
This bug
--- Comment #5 from eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com 2007-07-25 17:05
---
Patch to document AVR progmem attribute:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg01832.html
--
eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-11 02:16 ---
PR 27544 is about a missing docs for an attribute for RS6000, altivec.
PR 27543 is about ms_struct attribute on rs6000/PowerPC as it just says x86
supports it which is no longer true.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu
13 matches
Mail list logo