[Bug target/112413] Wrong switch jump table offset

2023-12-11 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112413 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug target/112413] Wrong switch jump table offset

2023-12-11 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112413 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/112413] Wrong switch jump table offset

2023-12-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112413 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eea25179d8d1406685b8b0995ba841605f895283 commit r14-6417-geea25179d8d1406685b8b0995ba841605f895283 Author: Mikael Pettersson Date:

[Bug target/112413] Wrong switch jump table offset

2023-12-11 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112413 --- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson --- Patch posted after bootstrap and regression testing on m68k-linux-gnu: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-December/640177.html

[Bug target/112413] Wrong switch jump table offset

2023-11-12 Thread vincent.riviere at freesbee dot fr via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112413 --- Comment #6 from Vincent Riviere --- (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #4) > Does the `.balignw` filler disappear if you drop `-malign-int`? No, it stays, but its value becomes 2, so it doesn't cause trouble.

[Bug target/112413] Wrong switch jump table offset

2023-11-11 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112413 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson --- Created attachment 56561 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56561=edit proposed fix, only compile-tested for now

[Bug target/112413] Wrong switch jump table offset

2023-11-09 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112413 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---

[Bug target/112413] Wrong switch jump table offset

2023-11-06 Thread vincent.riviere at freesbee dot fr via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112413 --- Comment #3 from Vincent Riviere --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I don't see any issues with the output of gcc. Are you sure this is not a > binutils gnu as issue where the offsets are done incorrectly there. Yes, I'm sure

[Bug target/112413] Wrong switch jump table offset

2023-11-06 Thread vincent.riviere at freesbee dot fr via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112413 --- Comment #2 from Vincent Riviere --- Cause is in gcc/config/m68k/linux.h, macro ASM_RETURN_CASE_JUMP: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/config/m68k/linux.h;h=2e1cb5498b86f053d1e9b7c530648dfa186ca4c4;hb=HEAD#l96 jmp

[Bug target/112413] Wrong switch jump table offset

2023-11-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112413 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target --- Comment #1 from Andrew